Description of Action Research

What I have learned about action research is that it is different from traditional research.  Traditional research involves the findings of an expert, which in most cases is a professor from a university that is isolated from the reality of his/her study.  My understanding of action research is that the person doing the research is actively involved with the study/research and that person is likely to facilitate changes based on the knowledge that is generated from the research (Dana 2010). 

Action research is a continuous process that is a series of reflections that include a diagnosis of a practical issue that needs improvement or needs to be resolved.  Once an issue has been identified, then there must be formulation of a plan and within the plan there must be strategies and from there implementation for effectiveness (Dana 2010).  Based on the results this can determine if the issue is considered resolved or if it has been improved.  Depending on the outcome, the data can spur inquiry in a more defined direction or a different direction.   At this point reflection is necessary.  The reflection gives the researcher an opportunity to digest the findings and determine if the results are desirable. 

The way that I might be able to use action research is I will be apart of the study, which makes the research interesting and not so dull.  By taking an active role allows me to see first hand whether my results are desirable or undesirable.  Of course, in my research I would want the results that support my original inquiry, however if it does not support it then redirection is necessary.  With the redirection, my reflection will pose more questions based on my original inquiry and from here the process starts over.